User talk:Haider 118
Welcome :D
[edit]
|
Heya again
[edit]Just wanted to make sure I got you another menu of welcome links so you can search for stuff while you're working on that article. Hopefully this will be easier than finding them through the IP you were using yesterday. I'm watching your talk page so if you need any help, you can reply here. I'm in and out today so I may not reply all that fast. CHeers! Millahnna (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:M&JS Foundation Logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:M&JS Foundation Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from JS Group. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 22:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from JS Group. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JS Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)- If you persist, your next block is likely to be indefinite. You cannot simply remove content because you do not want it there. If there is valid, policy-based reason for removal, you must work within processes to demonstrate that. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Edits like this one are likely to lead again to a block of your account. The statement is not in keeping with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You need to fix that before the tag is removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JS Bank - New logo 2011.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JS Bank - New logo 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Block
[edit]I have indefinitely blocked your account, as I do not believe at this point that you are interested to contributing to Wikipedia to provide disinterested information on subjects, but instead are focused on promoting a single entity: the JS Group and its services. You continually add content without reliable sources that promotes this entity and remove content with reliable sources that is critical to them. You continue to remove flags calling into question the neutrality of this material.
If you wish to contribute further, you may appeal your block by placing {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but I would strongly recommend that you read the guide to appealing blocks first. I do not believe you should be unblocked without some indication that you understand the purpose of Wikipedia and that you will not attempt to promote or whitewash articles related to this company.
If you have concerns that content in the article represents your organization unfairly, you may in the meantime contact the volunteer response team. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from enterprise), under "Contact us via e-mail". Please read all that content before reaching out, as an understanding of what they can do to help you is likely to make your contact more successful. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:JS Bank - New logo 2011 (1).jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JS Bank - New logo 2011 (1).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mahvash & Jahangir Siddiqui Foundation
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mahvash & Jahangir Siddiqui Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haider 118, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Saqib (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haider 118, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.